Subscribe
for just...
plus
The future of content consumption is link-based, socially sharable (and sometimes sourced) content, consumed in multi-sourced content aggregators, across multiple devices, and on a global scale.
Every single day you can read a ton of articles from media professional arguing for and against the paywall. Most call them backward looking, saying that they are being slammed in people's faces, and only put in place to save the newspapers' old print business models.
But there are many different types of paywalls. There are those that close the door and make you feel like you are walking into a wall every time you want to do something. And then there are those that don't; the non-slamming paywalls that reward the loyal reader.
The first kind, the one that gets in your way is brilliantly illustrated by Basil Fawlty in the video below:
The traditional paywall is blocking people from using your online news site. It is blocking you from reading it in a convenient way. It is blocking any form of sharing, and generally taking the reader hostage in exchange for money.
But, the idea of asking people to pay money for your product is not backward looking; that is future looking. That's how every single business on the entire planet operates. Apple secured its future by asking people to pay for their products. You don't get to have an iPhone for free, in exchange for iAds in their apps. That would be silly.
Money is not backward looking. It's future looking.
The problem we have today is two things:
Two weeks ago I was covering the 24 hours of Le Mans with my social tracker. And the social news stream (which is just a curated list of tweets from teams and drivers) provided far more news than any newspaper could ever bring.
During the free practice, the commentators speculated why the Nissan DeltaWing had stopped on the track, and they had no clue. At the same time Nissan tweeted that it was because the fire extinguisher had gone off causing the electrical system to shut down.
If your commentators spend all their time telling people that they have no clue, while the audience already knows the answer, why are you here? You are making the wrong product.
And this is the problem with almost all articles about paywalls or anti-paywalls that we see today. They are discussing the wrong kind of paywall (the traditional disconnected one) trying to sell you the wrong kind of product (news that is already freely available directly from the source).
No matter what you do about that, it's not going to work.
But this doesn't mean that *all* paywalls are backward looking, nor does it mean that news has to be free. It's just one tiny part that is wrong (sadly also the part that 99% focus on).
This *old* type of paywall is absolutely backward looking and has no future. So let's tear down this wall, and put up something else that actually makes sense.
Note: A couple of weeks ago I wrote an article about the paid-for trends, if you haven't read that yet, I suggest you do that first. This report is in many ways an extension of those trends.
Before we can even start to discuss how to 'fix' the paywall, we have to first fix the product.
The first problem is advertising. Media companies monetized by advertising will find that optimizing for advertisers, and optimizing for subscriptions will lead you in two completely different directions.
Register to try out Baekdal Plus completely for free for one week.
Baekdal Plus is your premium destination for trends and analysis for the media industry. Every year you get 25 reports about the future media trends, business and editorial strategies, monetization analysis and insights about how to use analytics specifically for publishers.
As a subscriber, you also get full access to all the Plus reports (more than 200) published over the past 8 years, as well as the ability to share what you read.
Yes, of course, please write to plus@baekdal.com and I will send you a regular invoice that you can pay via your bank. I will need your company name, address and VAT number (if within the EU). Also, please note that due to this process being manual, this will be for an annual subscription only.
Yes, please write to plus@baekdal.com for details. But for 25-99 users: the price is 20% off the subscription price ($79/year per user), 100+ users is a fixed price at $5,000 (for all combined).
Yes, please head over to Baekdal Media to read about consulting where I can help you with strategy reviews, trend and strategy reports, and strategic guidance for you media company or a specific publication.
Can a cheaper news product unlock more of your market? Let's explore.
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Bundling publications at random is not very useful, but using it as a tool to drive upsell is.
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Pricing a newspaper is almost never about the price itself.
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
What if something was free for one period and paid for another?
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Why do people pay for media? Let's map it out.
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Many newspapers have opened up their paywalls because of the pandemic. But this is a bad idea.
Free for subscribers
...or full access for $12
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé
plus
plus
plus
plus
plus
plus