Sorry, we could not find the combination you entered »
Please enter your email and we will send you an email where you can pick a new password.
Reset password:


Executive Report - By Thomas Baekdal - October 2012

Brands Versus Facebook Versus EdgeRank

In the future, buying reach for posts on Facebook will be part of the game, whether we like it or not.

Several readers have asked me to write about the drop in 'reach' on Facebook. What has happened is that Facebook has turned the dials on EdgeRank to force brands to spend even more on promoted posts for anyone not directly valuable to Facebook.

The way we see this is that reach (number of people who see your post) is down, while 'people talking about' remains the same. Or in other words, the people who engage are the same as always (the valuable group to Facebook), but the listeners (the majority of the people who buy your products) are less likely to see your posts.

Let me illustrate this in a very simple way:

What we don't know (because Facebook decided to no longer provide that data), is how many of the missing people have liked your page. That is, we don't know if the lower reach are people outside our circle of influence, or inside it.

As Mikael Lemberg, Client Partner of Facebook wrote (Danish):

The overall purpose of Facebook's news feed algorithm is to ensure that the content people consume on the frontpage is as interesting and engaging as possible. Put another way: Optimally, we want people to click, like, comment, etc. on all the stories in our news feed.
The mission of the News Feed algorithm is to predict what stories we are most likely to interact with, and then ensure that they are delivered before the stories we just want to consume passively.

I understand why the people of Facebook think this way. Facebook is based on an advertising economy, and as such they make more money the more people engage. Brands, however, are not based on an advertising economy. They are based on a sale economy.

This 18 page report is exclusive for subscribers. (login)

Subscribe now to get full access to this Baekdal/Executive report

This Baekdal/Executive article can only accessed bysubscribing to Baekdal/Executive (which also gives you full access to our full archieve of executive reports)

What is Baekdal?

Baekdal is a magazine for media professionals, focusing on media analysis, trends, patterns, strategy, journalistic focus, and newsroom optimization. Since 2010, it has helped publishers in more than 40 countries, including big and small publishers like Condé Nast, Bonnier, Schibsted, NRC, and others, as well as companies like Google and Microsoft.

Baekdal comes in three tiers:


Free weekly newsletters for media professionals, focusing on news, trends, and quick insights.


Weekly media insights and analysis for journalists, editors, and business managers, helping you focus and optimize your newsroom and audience engagement.


In-depth media reports for editors-in-chief, executives, and other decision makers, helping you understand the future of media, trends, patterns, monetization, data, and strategies.


The Baekdal/Basic Newsletter is the best way to be notified about the latest media reports, but it also comes with extra insights.

Get the newsletter

Thomas Baekdal

Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter

"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made ​​himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé


—   strategy   —


Strategy guide: On-demand vs time-based moments, and how they define publishers


Guide: How to set up and structure a dynamic paywall


The Audience Relevance Model - Complete overview and guide


A guide to using AI for publishers


How to fix people's perception that climate news is not useful?


A conversion that (never) ends. Mapping publisher funnels