Sorry, we could not find the combination you entered »
Please enter your email and we will send you an email where you can pick a new password.
Reset password:


Plus Report - By Thomas Baekdal - April 2013

The Three Levels of Uncertainty and the Boston Bombings

Yesterday, we all read about the terrible experience at the Boston Marathon. Two bombs exploded near the finishing line, killing three people so far and injuring 173. For anyone to commit such an act is beyond understanding or comprehension. The Boston Marathon is not a political event, or even an event associated with a certain country. It's an international event where people gather from all over the world to do what they love the most.

An attack on something like this is an attack on the very notion of freedom. Whoever did this is saying that people should not be allowed to enjoy their lives.

But I'm not going to write about the event, that's not what the purpose of this site is about. This site's purpose is to help people in the media industry to understand how to create value.

With all such tragedies like the one in Boston we see both the good, the bad and the really ugly side of the media industry. Everyone is trying to cover what is happening, everyone is feeling the pressure to be first, and the result is often that the media forget to care for the reader and instead start to speculate wildly about what may or may not have happened.

Some are truly trying to do a good job. Some are clearly not using their brains, and some are misleading people on the purpose to get more traffic. Most, however, are doing a bit of everything.

And even though this happens every single time, causing an increasing rate of negativity towards the press, the media just doesn't seem to learn the lesson.

From a trend perspective, the patterns are as clear as day. Since 9/11, which was the first big incident that took full advantage of the connected world, the public opinion about the press has been slipping. Before 9/11, people got this type of news via print, and mostly accepted the story because (by the time it hit the newsstand) it had been edited and curated so that it was actually valuable to read. But after 9/11, the connected world allowed everyone to follow the events live as they happened, unfiltered, and from thousand of sources. And the result is not pretty.

The role of the press in the event of a crisis is to keep people informed and be the place to go to both for getting help and understanding what it's all about. When people are running around scared not knowing what the heck is going on, the role of the press is to stay focused and find the answers.

That, however, is not happening in this age of livestreaming. Instead the press seems to be running around just as frantically as anyone else, reporting all kinds of strange things without giving people any kind of real insights.

In many cases, they are even making the incident worse by reporting rumors as facts, and tying unrelated events together that have nothing to do with what's actually going on.

The result of all this is an increasing trend of public annoyance with the press. Erik Wemple over at the Washington Post summarized many of these reactions in, "Boston explosions: Twitter acts as journalism's ombudsman".

People were saying: "Personally, I find it an act of respect to those implicated in the Boston explosions to avoid throwing out speculation and conspiracies. (@DanzaDragon)" and "As great as Twitter is for breaking news, the whole stream of uninformed and unhelpful speculation that follows makes my teeth grind (@ImTyUK)".

The same thing was being repeated over and over again while I was watching people's reactions to the event.

People are getting really annoyed about the press. And when a particular newspaper was caught in a lie (or what they call an unconfirmed rumor described as a confirmed fact), people rejoiced that the particular newspaper had been caught with their pants down.

This is not a healthy trend for the media industry. We already have the problem that 96% don't think newspapers are relevant, and that journalists are the second least trusted profession of all (ranking almost as low as politicians).

So how can we fix this?

Learn from the analytics world

One of the big changes in the world of media is the shift from pundits (or what the media calls 'experts'), to the world of data. And in the world of data, we have a very simple way to determine the trustworthiness of that data, and how we can then use it in our reports.

It's called:

This 17 page report is exclusive for subscribers. (login)

Try it free for one week

Register to try out Baekdal Plus completely for free for one week.

for just...
for just...
You get one month for free


Baekdal Plus is your premium destination for trends and analysis for the media industry. Every year you get 25 reports about the future media trends, business and editorial strategies, monetization analysis and insights about how to use analytics specifically for publishers.

As a subscriber, you also get full access to all the Plus reports (more than 200) published over the past 8 years, as well as the ability to share what you read.

I'm a company, can we pay via an invoice?

Yes, of course, please write to and I will send you a regular invoice that you can pay via your bank. I will need your company name, address and VAT number (if within the EU). Also, please note that due to this process being manual, this will be for an annual subscription only.

Is there an Enterprise Plan?

Yes, please write to for details. But for 25-99 users: the price is 20% off the subscription price ($79/year per user), 100+ users is a fixed price at $5,000 (for all combined).

Can you create a report just for us?

Yes, please head over to Baekdal Media to read about consulting where I can help you with strategy reviews, trend and strategy reports, and strategic guidance for you media company or a specific publication.



The Baekdal Plus Newsletter is the best way to be notified about the latest media reports, but it also comes with extra insights.

Get the newsletter

Thomas Baekdal

Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter

"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made ​​himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé


—   strategy   —


Publishers need to get news off Facebook


The future of journalism: How three different types of stories require a massively different focus


What if a news app helped you understand your news reading better?


What if virtual events were not an event?


How do we define the value of journalism in the future?


The future of advertising for publishers is first-party data