Remember when Nick Denton decided to get rid of the old blog-like format of Gawker and introduce a new app like experience? The result was a dramatic drop in traffic because of three things.
Gawker's traffic is slowly coming back. In the short run, it was a disaster, but in the long run - especially for a site like Gawker - it is the right thing to do. The new site focuses heavily on the content itself + other stories to watch. Rather than a blog focus, or worse, a newspaper front page focus, Nick knows that people do not share blogs or front pages. They share individual articles.
He just need to fix the technical problems and he has to do something about the sidebar. Make the content look less like a technical list, and more like interesting articles you might want to read.
It is the right strategy. It just needs to be implemented better.
I am currently having a Gawker redesign moment of my own. I recently moved Baekdal Design, a sub-section of this site, to a new domain - 42concepts.com. The result is a dramatic drop in "design" traffic simply because the old links have changed.
It is not that the links doesn't work anymore (they do), but the design articles lost their social rank (mostly from Stumbleupon) and all the search engine traffic.
It is not the first time I have experienced this. Back when I was setting up Baekdal Plus, I made a catastrophic mistake of disabling older links to this site. You can see the effect in the graph below.
The error was a just a technical glitch in one line of code, causing Baekdal Plus to hijack the link, and discarding it because the design article wasn't in the Baekdal Plus database. And I fixed it immediately when I discovered it the next day.
But the damage was done. Traffic dropped by 86% in just two days. It continued to drop, even after I fixed the problem. Worse of all, it took more than a month to recover. And, if it wasn't for the two traffic spikes in November, it would probably have taken even longer.
Link consistency is absolutely critical!
The lesson here is simple. Do not change the link. And if you do. Consider your existing social traffic as lost - something that have to be rebuild.
When moving Baekdal Design to 42Concepts, I not only change the link, I also move the whole thing to a completely different domain.
I knew that by doing it, I would lose my social traffic. It is an absolute disaster in the short run. But in the long run it doesn't make much of a difference. Social traffic is a very short term stream.
But keep this in mind the next time someone suggest that you should redesign something, or that you should change the structure. You need to have a really good reason for doing so. It is a huge risk to take, and it takes months to recover from the "social shock" it creates.
Of course, if you believe the change is necessary - and that it will help you grow in the long run - it is a risk worth taking.
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé