We have Black Hat SEO and White Hat SEO. One is terrible, the other is good. And the same can be said about viral.
Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines, or involve deception.
White hat advice is generally summed up as creating great content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the search engines, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose.
Note: via Wikipedia
Similarly, black hat viral content attempts to improve pageviews and clickthroughs in ways that involve deception or social engineering. One technique involves using deceptive headlines to lure people to click on a link. Another method uses optimized psychological triggers that trick people to act in a certain way, much like gambling sites.
White hat viral content is about creating great content that inspires and empowers people, resulting in a form of word-of-mouth that is based on sharing that value.
In the SEO world, people resorting to black hat techniques are shunned and despised because they 'ruin it for everyone'. But it wasn't always like that. In the early days of SEO, everyone focused on black hat techniques. It was the norm until we realize how bad it was.
We are currently seeing the same evolution in viral. Many people today, even big respectable publishers, are doing black hat viral content. But things are changing. And in a few years, everyone will know the difference between black hat viral content and white hat viral content.
To give you an example:
Walk off the Earth is a great example of 'white hat viral content'. Take a video like the one below where they do a cappella/beatbox version Taylor Swift's hit "I Knew You Were Trouble".
It's amazing... and it went viral because of it. It currently has 21 million views.
It's designed specifically for you and me, It's not designed for 'Facebook' or 'YouTube'. Just like White hat SEO is about creating great content for users and not for search engines.
In comparison, The content below is black hat viral content. It's content created for the sole purpose of optimizing how many clicks and pageviews they can get from social channels. They don't care about you and me. It's only about optimizing for the clicks.
My question to you is simply this (if you are a publisher or a brand): Do you really think you have a future in focusing on black hat viral content?
Of course, It's not just about content. It's also about all other forms of media. Take gaming. We have white hat games, that focuses on giving you amazing experiences. Games that are so good that people want to support their development through steam early-access and crowdsourcing.
And then we have black hat games, which are about optimizing psychological triggers that forces people into an endless in-app purchasing cycle.
It's the same old story, the same old patterns, and the same old outcome.
So, the next time you have an editorial meeting where you are going to discuss your future content strategy, bring a white board with you and write 'black hat' on one side, and 'white hat' on the other side. And then for each content idea people propose, place it in either one.
If you end the meeting with your content ideas leaning to the black hat side, ask yourself if that is really what you want to bet your future on.
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé