Everyone who have been working with digital media for the past 10 years know about the struggle to get people to buy into it. Upper management is a chapter of its own but is a problem among all levels of employees.
10 years ago, it kind of made sense that you had to convince people to use digital media. After all, digital media were only a small channel. In the year 2001, digital media were only one third of the size of newspapers.
I have been at hundreds of meetings pitching the idea of digital media. I have held mini-seminars, showcasing all the wonders of new media. And, I have had one-on-one meetings with C-suite executives. All of them with the focus on persuading "if" and "why" they should embrace it.
In the past 4 years, the focus has predominantly been on social media. Always "If" and "why".
...but not anymore!
The world has changed. The thing we have all been talking about, for the past 10 years, is now a reality. The internet is now the dominant media channel.
You are wasting your time if you are still going to a meeting to ask "if" or "why" you should use social media. You should be asking, "how should we use it? How do we do it better? How can we get more out of it?"
Stop talking about "if". Take control of the conversation and focus on "how"!
The next time you meet a person skeptical about the future of digital media, focus the first 5 minutes of the conversation to set the fact straight.
Don't tell them about how big Facebook is or how many tweets people sent during the Oscars. It makes for spectacular numbers, but it means very little.
Simple take out a piece of paper (or whiteboard), draw 15 small stick-men in one group, next to another group with just 5 people in it. Write the word "Newspapers & Magazines" underneath the big group, and "digital media" under the other.
Then take out a $100 bill from your wallet. Hand it to the manager, and now ask him:
if this is your budget and you can only spend it on one group, which one would it be?"
Would you spend it on digital media and only reach 5 people. Or would you spend it on newspapers and reach three times as many?
The manager is not stupid, he would immediately place the $100 bill on the newspaper group. That is the only decision that makes sense.
And now you move in to make the point. Once the manager has placed the $100 bill on the table, write "2001" on the paper, and say:
This is what the world looked like in 2001. The newspaper market reached 3 times as many people as digital media. This was the right decision 10 years ago.
Then pick out a red market. Draw a line over the 2001 and replace it with 2011. Say:
Today the world is very different. Traditional media have been in decline for years. People are now going elsewhere to get inspired
Confirm the fact by pointing to this study by PEW Research (only use the graph that represent your target market.)
Note: Obviously, if your target market is above 50, you are out of luck.
Note: Also read "The Future of Marketing Budgets" (Baekdal Plus)
Then draw over the newspaper label and write "digital media" underneath it. Say:
Newspapers are now the size of what digital media used to be in 2001.
Draw a line over the digital label, write "newspapers" instead, and say:
And, digital media are now the size of newspapers.
Draw 2 extra men in the new digital column. Say:
In fact, digital media are now bigger than what newspapers where back then.
In 2001, you made a great decision by focusing the majority of your budget on traditional media. That was where people were.
You need to continue to make good decisions like that. You need to use your budgets in ways that reach the biggest group of customers - in digital media.
Bam! The effect is immediate and extremely effective. Now you can spend the rest of the meeting on talking about "how" to do it.
Note: Beware of internal silos and power struggles. They can foil even the best of plans - often with a complete disregard for logic.
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé